Key takeaways
  • The Fed held rates at 3.75%-4.00% on 28 October by a 10-2 vote; both dissenters, Lisa D. Cook and Beth M. Hammack, wanted a hike, not a cut.
  • The October CPI report, published 10 November, carries no year-over-year figure because BLS did not collect October 2025 data during a lapse in appropriations.
  • The 10-year Treasury yield rose 10 basis points on CPI release day alone, more than it moved on the Fed's own 28 October decision day.
  • The last confirmed annual CPI reading, for September, was 3.7% headline and 2.6% core; December's FOMC meeting on 8-9 December is the next scheduled test.

The 10-year Treasury yield moved more on 10 November, the day the October inflation report came out, than it did on the day the Federal Reserve itself met two weeks earlier. It rose from 4.88% to 4.98%, 10 basis points in a single session, while the 30-year climbed from 5.26% to 5.35%, according to the Treasury's daily par yield curve. The report that moved it was missing the number investors usually read first.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics published the October Consumer Price Index on 10 November with a headline monthly rise of 0.4% and a core reading, which strips out food and energy, of 0.3%. Both are seasonally adjusted. Neither comes with a year-over-year figure. "BLS did not collect survey data for October 2025 because of a lapse in appropriations," the release states. "For most CPI series, BLS could not publish October 2025 indexes." The usual comparison, this month's prices against the same month a year ago, has no base to compare against.

The vote that came first

Two weeks before the CPI report, on 28 October, the Federal Open Market Committee held its benchmark rate at 3.75% to 4.00%, unchanged from where it stood after the September meeting. That decision passed 10 to 2. Lisa D. Cook and Beth M. Hammack dissented, and both wanted the opposite of easier money: a quarter-point hike. The September increase that set the current range had passed 12 to 0.

The committee's statement called inflation "elevated" and committed to "deliver price stability," without giving a date or a condition for the next move. It cited resilient spending, strong capital investment and steady job growth, alongside unspecified geopolitical uncertainty. A committee that hiked unanimously in September and then split over whether to hike again in October is not a committee that has decided inflation is handled.

The data released between the two events supported the "steady job growth" the statement claimed: nonfarm payrolls rose by 165,000 in October, and unemployment held at 4.1%, BLS reported on 6 November. That is a moderate number, not a surge and not a stall. The 10-year yield itself moved only 2 basis points on jobs-report day, 6 November (4.84% to 4.86%), a fifth of the 10-basis-point move the CPI report produced three days later.

Dissents of any kind are uncommon on the FOMC; a committee that votes 10-2 against its own holding decision, with both dissenters pushing in the hawkish direction rather than the dovish one, says the disagreement is about whether policy is tight enough, not about whether it has gone too far. The statement did not name a threshold, a data point or a date that would resolve the disagreement by December.

A report with no yardstick

Inside the October numbers, the categories that moved look familiar: energy rose 0.7% on the month, food rose 0.5%, and shelter, the largest single category in the index, rose 0.3%. The all-items index itself stood at 337.511 on the 1982-84 base, not seasonally adjusted.

What is missing is the comparison that usually tells a reader whether 0.4% is hot or mild. Annualized, a string of 0.4% months would run close to 4.9%, well above the Fed's 2% target. But the last confirmed annual reading, for the 12 months to September, was 3.7%, itself up from 3.4% in August, with the core measure at 2.6%. Whether October's monthly prints mark an acceleration or a plateau will not be answerable from the official series until BLS can publish a clean 12-month comparison again.

The gap is narrower than it first looks. Only the October 2025 reference period went uncollected. September 2025 prices had already been gathered on BLS's normal schedule before the lapse began, and collection resumed on 14 November 2025, so November 2025 has a full record. That means the November 2026 CPI report, due 10 December, will carry a clean 12-month comparison again. The FOMC meets the day before, on 8 and 9 December, so the committee will make its next rate decision one day ahead of the data that would answer the question its own dissenters raised in October.

The move that followed

Treasury yields had been falling into the CPI release, not rising. The 10-year touched 4.84% on 5 November, its lowest point of the window, before edging up to 4.88% by 9 November. The 30-year followed the same path: 5.25% on 5 November, 5.26% on 9 November. The jump came mostly on release day, when the 10-year added 10 basis points and the 30-year added 9. On the FOMC's own decision day, 28 October, the 10-year had moved from 4.99% the day before to 5.05%, a six-basis-point shift. The bond market moved more on the CPI report than on the meeting that preceded it.

10-year and 30-year Treasury yields, late October to CPI release day (%)
10-year30-year
4.855.25.427 Oct28 Oct30 Oct5 Nov9 Nov10 Nov4.98%5.35%
4.855.25.428 Oct5 Nov10 Nov4.98%5.35%

The Fed's own preferred gauge, the Commerce Department's personal consumption expenditures price index, did not lose its annual comparison the way CPI did. When BEA hit the same October 2025 hole, it built around it: it "derived seasonally adjusted price indexes for October using the geometric mean of the September and November CPIs," according to its own release, rather than publish no figure at all. BEA's October 2026 Personal Income and Outlays report, covering the same month CPI just left blank, is due 25 November and should carry a usable year-over-year number. Two statistical agencies hit the identical gap and made different choices about what to tell the public in the meantime.

What the real yield says

On 10 November, the 10-year breakeven inflation rate, the gap between a nominal Treasury and its inflation-protected equivalent, stood at 2.20%, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Subtracted from the 4.98% nominal 10-year yield that day, that puts the real yield at roughly 2.78%, a level that pays a holder well above expected inflation if the breakeven proves right.

A breakeven is a market price, not a forecast with a track record: it reflects what Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities traders are willing to pay relative to nominal bonds on a given day, and it moves with liquidity and positioning as well as with inflation views. Still, a breakeven near 2.2%, against a Fed target of 2%, is not pricing a return to the hot readings in September's annual data, even as the committee itself remains divided on whether that is the right call.

The next test

Cook and Hammack are on record wanting a hike as of the October meeting. The committee will decide again on 8 and 9 December, a meeting that also carries an updated Summary of Economic Projections, each member's own quarterly rate forecast. It will do so one day before BLS publishes the first clean year-over-year CPI reading since September. Neither the Fed nor BLS has said whether that sequencing was a factor in setting the December meeting date, and neither has been asked.

Our take

A committee that hikes unanimously one meeting and splits the next is telling the market something, even if the statement itself does not say what. Two sitting governors preferring tighter policy while the official inflation gauge is temporarily unreadable is an unusual combination, and it argues against reading the October hold as confidence that inflation is under control.

Against that, the market's own pricing on decision day barely moved, six basis points on the 10-year, against ten on the day a single monthly data point arrived with no annual context at all. That gap is larger than it should be if investors shared the dissenters' concern. It may say more about a market trading the one number it has than about where policy is actually headed.

We hold no position in Treasury securities beyond conventional cash management and have no view to defend on the direction of the December decision.

Common questions

Did the Federal Reserve raise interest rates in October 2026?

No. The FOMC held the federal funds target range at 3.75% to 4.00% on 28 October 2026. The vote was 10-2, with Lisa D. Cook and Beth M. Hammack dissenting in favor of a quarter-point hike.

Why doesn't the October 2026 CPI report show a year-over-year inflation rate?

The Bureau of Labor Statistics did not collect CPI survey data for October 2025 because of a lapse in appropriations, so most series have no October 2025 index to compare October 2026 against.

What was the last confirmed annual US inflation rate?

The 12 months ending September 2026 showed headline CPI up 3.7% and core CPI (excluding food and energy) up 2.6%, both reported by BLS on 14 October 2026.

How much did Treasury yields move after the October 2026 CPI report?

The 10-year Treasury yield rose from 4.88% to 4.98% and the 30-year rose from 5.26% to 5.35% between 9 and 10 November 2026, according to the Treasury's daily par yield curve.

When is the Federal Reserve's next interest rate decision?

The FOMC's next scheduled meeting is 8-9 December 2026, which also includes an updated Summary of Economic Projections.

See Velora first on GoogleAdd us as a preferred source and our research shows up higher in your Top Stories.Add as a preferred source on Google
Related reading
Why Treasury Yields Rose After the Fed's September Rate Hike →US Saving Rate Falls to 3.8% in September 2026 →Foreign Investors Sold US Treasuries in July. In August They Bought $90.9 Billion. →

This analysis is for informational purposes only and is not personal investment advice. Valid as of publication date; conditions evolve. Past returns are not indicative of future results. Pressure-test the framing against your own thesis before acting on it.

Back to researchJoin for deeper access