Key takeaways
  • The Court of Justice of the EU ruled on 29 April 2025 that Malta's investor-citizenship scheme breached EU law, ending the last route to an EU passport bought outright.
  • Spain closed its own golden visa to new applicants from 3 April 2025 and Portugal had already removed real estate from its version on 7 October 2023.
  • In June 2026 the European Commission wrote to five Caribbean governments giving them until 1 June 2028 to phase out citizenship-by-investment or risk losing visa-free access to the Schengen area.
  • The legal basis changed too: since the European Parliament's vote on 7 October 2025, operating an investor-citizenship scheme is itself a standalone ground for suspension, regardless of how well the programme is run.

Five Caribbean governments opened identical letters in late June 2026. Each came from Magnus Brunner, the European Commissioner for Internal Affairs and Migration, and each said the same thing: phase out your citizenship-by-investment programme by 1 June 2028, or risk losing visa-free access to the Schengen area for your citizens. Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada, St Kitts and Nevis, and St Lucia all received the request.

That letter did not arrive out of nowhere. It is the fourth move in a sequence that started with a Maltese court case and has not reversed once. Each move used a different legal instrument, in a different jurisdiction, for a different stated reason, and each one still ended with a route to an EU passport or EU-adjacent visa-free travel closing rather than loosening.

The sequence, in order

Portugal went first, and almost by accident. Lei n.º 56/2023, the "Mais Habitação" housing law, took effect on 7 October 2023 and stripped every real-estate and passive capital-transfer route out of the Golden Visa. The law was not written to kill investment migration; it was written to calm a housing market. It did both.

Malta went next, and this time it was not politics but law. The scheme under challenge, Citizenship by Naturalisation for Exceptional Services by Direct Investment, started in July 2020 when Malta amended its Citizenship Act, followed by the Granting of Citizenship for Exceptional Services Regulations adopted on 20 November 2020. It offered Maltese, and therefore EU, nationality in exchange for a direct payment to the state, with no residence requirement attached.

On 29 April 2025 the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled in Case C-181/23, European Commission v Malta, that the scheme breached Article 20 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 4(3) of the Treaty on European Union. The Court's language was specific: granting nationality for a predetermined financial contribution, without a genuine link between the person and the country, amounted to the commercialisation of citizenship itself, and by extension of EU citizenship, which every Maltese passport also carries.

Malta's scheme was the last one in the EU offering citizenship, as opposed to residency, in exchange for money alone. After 29 April 2025, no EU member state has one.

The EU's investor-migration retreat, 2023 to 2026 (events)
00.511.5220232024202520261 events0 events2 events1 events
00.511.5220232024202520261 events0 events2 events1 events
Source: Count of distinct national or EU-level restrictions by year: Portugal (2023), Malta CJEU ruling + Spain repeal (2025), EU Caribbean letters (2026)

Spain's turn came three months after Malta's, through a different mechanism entirely: a budget and justice bill with no stated connection to immigration. Disposición Final 21.1 of Ley Orgánica 1/2025, published in the Boletín Oficial del Estado on 3 January 2025, repealed Articles 63 to 67 of Spain's 2013 entrepreneurs law with effect from 3 April 2025. Every investor-visa route under that law closed to new applicants on the same day: the €500,000 real-estate option, business-project investment, shares, bank deposits and public debt. People who already held the visa kept it. Nobody new could apply.

Three jurisdictions, three different instruments, housing law, a Court judgment, a justice-reform bill, and the same outcome each time.

A new tool, and a precedent already on the books

The mechanism Brussels used against the Caribbean five is not new. It was triggered once before, against Vanuatu in 2022, after a Commission analysis found the country's investor-citizenship scheme a security risk; the result was a temporary suspension of Vanuatu's own visa-free access. What changed in 2025 is that the mechanism no longer needs a finding of harm to apply specifically to citizenship-by-investment.

The European Parliament's LIBE Committee adopted its position on the revision on 19 March 2025, naming investor-citizenship schemes and hybrid threats as new standalone suspension grounds alongside the mechanism's older triggers. Negotiators reached final agreed text on 17 June 2025. The full Parliament voted it through on 7 October 2025, 518 in favour, 96 against, 24 abstaining.

Before that reform, suspending a country's visa-free status required evidence of a problem: a surge in irregular stays, a jump in unfounded asylum claims, rising serious crime linked to travellers from that country. The revised mechanism added something that did not exist before Vanuatu's case forced the question: operating an investor-citizenship scheme is now, on its own, a standalone ground for suspension, independent of whether the programme causes any measurable harm. The threshold for what counts as a 'substantial increase' in the older grounds also dropped, from 50% to 30%.

The Commission's letters to the five Caribbean states, sent less than nine months after the October vote, are the reformed mechanism's first use against citizenship-by-investment programmes specifically, rather than against the narrower harms the old version required.

The part that has not happened

No programme has closed because of the June 2026 letters. No visa-free access has been suspended. The European Commission has not published the letters itself; what is public comes from the Caribbean side, starting with Prime Minister Gaston Browne's office in Antigua and Barbuda, which said it had advance word the letters were coming from 20 June 2026 and that it intends to keep running its programme.

The Commission's ask includes a 24-month transition window after the June 2028 deadline and a request for interim measures, tighter vetting and the exclusion of anyone under EU sanctions, in place by September 2026. That is a negotiation, not an ultimatum with no exit. Five governments that depend on citizenship-by-investment revenue have two years of room before the clock most matters, and nothing in the public record says how that negotiation ends.

The Vanuatu case is the only precedent for how this specific mechanism plays out once triggered, and it is a limited one: a single small Pacific state, a temporary suspension with no public 2028-style deadline attached, and no comparable multi-country negotiation. Five Caribbean states negotiating together, with more combined diplomatic weight and more fiscal dependence on the programmes at stake, is a different situation, and the record does not yet show which way that difference cuts.

What the pattern says, and what it doesn't

Four actions since October 2023, none connected to the others in drafting or motive, have each landed in the same place: a route into or near the EU that could once be bought has closed or is under formal notice to close. That is a pattern, not a single policy decision anyone could reverse by amending one law.

It is not evidence that every investment-migration route everywhere is closing. The UAE's Golden Visa, Gulf residency-by-investment, and programmes outside the EU's direct sphere of influence are not named in any of this. What is closing, specifically, is the subset of routes that touch EU citizenship or EU-adjacent visa-free access. That is a narrower claim than 'golden visas are dying', and it is the one the record actually supports.

The EU side of this did not start in 2025 either. The visa-suspension mechanism now being used against the Caribbean five was written years earlier for a different problem, visa-free abuse generally, and was tested once before it was ever aimed at investor-citizenship by name. In 2022 the European Commission ran an analysis of Vanuatu's citizenship-by-investment programme, concluded it posed a security risk to the EU, and the mechanism was used to suspend Vanuatu's own visa-free access as a result. That case sat on the books as a precedent for three years before the European Parliament's LIBE Committee formally proposed, on 19 March 2025, writing investor-citizenship schemes into the mechanism as their own named ground, with no security finding required. Negotiators agreed final text on 17 June 2025, and the full Parliament ratified it on 7 October 2025. The Caribbean letters sent in June 2026 are not a new policy improvised for this case. They are the first use of a tool the EU built, tested once, and then generalised.

What we are watching

- **September 2026**: the Commission's requested deadline for the five Caribbean states to put interim vetting measures in place, including excluding anyone under EU sanctions. Confirms the pressure is real if any state publishes a response; confirms it is being treated as a soft deadline if September passes with no public move from either side. - **1 June 2028**: the Commission's stated deadline for the five states to have phased out citizenship-by-investment entirely. The 24-month transition window the Commission has offered runs from this date, not before it. - **Beyond 2028**: whether any of the five states reaches a negotiated carve-out, converts its programme into a residency-only route, as Portugal did with its non-property Golden Visa options, or loses visa-free Schengen access outright. Any one of those three outcomes would be a first for this specific mechanism; none has happened yet.

Our take

Take the counter-case first. A letter is not a suspension. The European Commission has not published the Caribbean correspondence itself, no programme has closed, and no Schengen access has actually been withdrawn anywhere. Antigua and Barbuda's government said in July 2026 it intends to keep its programme and had advance notice of the letters from 20 June 2026, which suggests five small states with real fiscal dependence on citizenship-by-investment revenue have room to negotiate rather than capitulate, and 2028 is a long way off.

Our reading is still that the direction only runs one way. Malta's scheme did not survive a Court ruling. Spain's did not survive a housing-politics decision. Portugal cut its real-estate route in 2023 under the same pressure. None of those reversed. The EU did not previously need a standalone legal ground to act against an investor-citizenship programme; as of 7 October 2025 it has one, built for exactly this situation, and it used it within nine months.

The relevant fact for anyone holding or planning a second residency or citizenship is not whether any single programme survives. It is that the legal and political cost of running one inside or next to the EU's orbit has gone up every year since 2023, on a straight line, through four separate and unconnected national and EU-level actions. A plan that assumes the current list of open programmes stays open for a decade is pricing in a stability the last three years do not support.

Velora does not operate, sell or broker citizenship-by-investment or golden-visa programmes in any jurisdiction. This article covers public legal and regulatory developments only.

Common questions

Can you still buy EU citizenship in 2026?

No direct route exists. The Court of Justice of the EU ruled on 29 April 2025 (Case C-181/23) that Malta's investor-citizenship scheme, the last scheme offering citizenship for a financial contribution, breached Article 20 TFEU and Article 4(3) TEU. Malta's scheme was Europe's final direct citizenship-by-investment programme.

Why did the EU shut down Malta's golden passport?

The Court of Justice found that Malta's scheme amounted to the commercialisation of nationality, granting citizenship for a predetermined payment without requiring a genuine link between the applicant and the country. The Court held this undermined Article 20 TFEU, which grounds EU citizenship in a national bond, and Article 4(3) TEU's duty of sincere cooperation between member states.

Is Spain's golden visa still available?

No. Spain repealed its investor-visa chapter through Ley Orgánica 1/2025, published in the BOE on 3 January 2025, with effect from 3 April 2025. Every route under the old law, including the €500,000 real estate option, closed to new applicants. Holders who obtained the visa before that date keep their rights.

What does the EU want from Caribbean citizenship-by-investment programmes?

In letters dated 25 June 2026, signed by Commissioner for Internal Affairs and Migration Magnus Brunner, the European Commission asked Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada, St Kitts and Nevis, and St Lucia to phase out their programmes by 1 June 2028, with interim vetting measures requested by September 2026. Antigua and Barbuda's government has said it will defend its programme.

Can the EU actually suspend visa-free travel over a citizenship-by-investment programme?

Since the European Parliament adopted the revised visa-suspension mechanism on 7 October 2025 (518 votes to 96, with 24 abstentions), operating an investor-citizenship scheme is itself a standalone ground for suspension, independent of how the programme is administered. The reform also lowered the threshold for a 'substantial increase' in irregular stays or serious crime from 50% to 30%.

Where can an investor still get residency or citizenship by investment?

Outside the EU and its immediate periphery, routes remain open, including the UAE's Golden Visa and a handful of Caribbean and Gulf programmes, though the Caribbean programmes are now the ones under direct EU pressure. The pattern across 2023 to 2026 has been retirement or restriction of Western routes rather than closure everywhere.

See Velora first on GoogleAdd us as a preferred source and our research shows up higher in your Top Stories.Add as a preferred source on Google
Related reading
Capital mobility in a multipolar world →Indonesia's 2026 capital controls and the Bali financial centre →Why the dollar stays the reserve currency: the plumbing, not the military →

This analysis is for informational purposes only and is not personal investment advice. Valid as of publication date; conditions evolve. Past returns are not indicative of future results. Pressure-test the framing against your own thesis before acting on it.

Back to researchJoin for deeper access